Villa Carlotta.
Villa Carlotta on Lake Como was owned by Giovanni Battista Sommariva. He was in direct competition with Francesco Melzi d' Eril across the water at Villa Melzi. As a consequence both men fought to out do each other in terms of garden splendour.
At Villa Carlotta you will find a wealth of trees and shrubs that came in from all over the world. Large specimen trees and Rhododendrons to name a few. The plant range is breathtaking and helpfully almost every plant is labelled to aid identification. We visited the Carlotta and Melzi mid April which in hind sight is a touch to early. By early to mid-May the Rhododendrons and Azaleas will be stunning and a mass of colour. Thats not to say that when we visited the Magnolias where not worth seeing alone!
The main difference between Carlotta and Melzi is that Carlotta only allows selected views of Lake Como whereas Melzi incorporates the whole vista of the lake into the garden.
The striking difference between gardens in the lakes region and say Rome or Florence is the maintenance aspect. The attention to weeding and pruning far outstrips most gardens southwards. Pruning is an art and carried out to the highest level that I have ever seen in Italy. There are more gardeners per garden and all it seem take a pride in their respective gardens.
The gardens of the lakes are more for the plants person than any other gardens in Italy. I suggest any visit is planned for May/June but watch out for the hottest summer months, the traffic and visitor numbers I would think will be heavy and the gardens will be past their best with mid- Spring being the best time to visit.
If you like this blog please join and follow.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
400th Anniversary of Le Notre at Vaux Le Vicomte
There will never be a better year to visit Vaux le Vicomte. The Chateau have arranged a breathtaking season of events to showcase the sublime baroque landscape of Vaux and showcase the master of formal design Andre Le Notre.
Please see the deatils below but I urge you if possible put what I feel is the best baroque landscape and garden in France on your list of places to visit.
Starts on April 12th. It is a unique opportunity to share the most remarkable aspect of the 17th century: The Art of the French Formal Garden.
Vaux le Vicomte is its founding piece, a model of harmony between architecture and landscape which inspired the whole Europe
The season will bring together a series of ambitious showpieces to pay homage to the master's genius and the spirit of the site. You are invited to enjoy them in exclusivity.
If you need a good overview of the estate and its history, see Monty Don’s recent visit to the Gardens of Vaux le Vicomte on www.bbc.co.uk.
AVAILABLE ON: June : 11, 15 and 30
July : 9, 13 and 28 August : 13, 17 and 25
September : 10 and 14 October : 8 and 12
TARIFICATIONS
Per person / 20 people minimum
"EXCLUSIVE VISIT"
33€
For a unique and exceptional day in Vaux le Vicomte, including
If you come a Saturday, the candlelight visit of the garden is offered
.
These options are not included in the basic price
Lunch at l’Ecureuil in the outbuildings of the Château
20€
-
The walk in the garden led by Patrick Borgeot, chief-gardener of the estate of Vaux le Vicomte. 20€
10€
INFORMATION
INFORMATION AND BOOKING
Muirgen Rio
+(033) 1 64 14 41 92 / commercial@vaux-le-vicomte.com
Erika Dubois
+(033) 1 64 14 41 99 / erikadubois@vaux-le-vicomte.com
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Upton Grey book review
Gertrude
Jekyll; Her Art Restored at Upton Grey.
The author describes this book as a visual record of a
restored Gertrude Jekyll garden. What the author does not say is that the book
and for that matter the garden is a true labour of love and devotion. The book
is full of superb photographs that support the text which in turn has been
carefully and painstakingly researched to give an insightful and accurate history
and record of Jekyll’s work and planting. I particularly enjoyed seeing the
water colour of the bougainvillea by Jekyll reproduced on page 138.
Jekyll’s design ideas and use of plants make compelling
reading. She was able to interplay the ‘formal’ and the ‘free’ style of design
as the author describes it. Jekyll made use of plants that had fallen from
fashion and used them to create a unified effect. When a visitor showed
surprise at ‘’those horrid old bedding
plants’’ Gertrude replied by saying that they were, ‘’passive agents in their own misuse’’. We should remember this when some of us get a little sniffy about bedding! The chapters cover the different sections of the garden
and each section is discussed in detail, supported by excellent photographs.
This book and the garden at Upton Grey are important
historical documents, a visual record for present day designers to study and
learn from. Some people will say that a garden should not be a copy of the past but should progress and move forward, be prepared to change. But then how do we learn from the past, see what was seen in 1908, study the craft of the great designers? At Upton Grey we have the way to see just how Jekyll worked and planted. I enjoyed reading this book and I always enjoy a visit to Upton
Grey to see the garden. Rosamund always make you very welcome.
Gertrude Jekyll; Her
Art Restored at Upton Grey. Published by Garden Art Press
ISBN 978 1 87067 377 8
Friday, March 22, 2013
Vaux Le Vicomte
Vaux
Le Vicomte
‘’On
17th August 1661 at six in the evening, Fouquet was the King of
France; at 2pm in the morning he was nothing’’ Voltaire.
When Nicolas Fouquet (Lord
High Treasurer of France, Superintendent of Finance) brought together the
greatest talent of the 17th Century in France, Louis Le Vau, Charles
Le Brun and Andre Le Notre to design and build his new country chateau and
garden called Vaux Le Vicomte, situated thirty four miles south east of Paris,
he set the fashion in France for the baroque garden for at least the next one
hundred years.
It must be understood that in all the great gardens of
France at this time no one man was responsible for the creation of chateau and
gardens, they were in fact an amalgamation of many talented men and minds. Of
course, this could lead to artistic and temperamental differences as happens
when great minds and even greater egos come together. In the case of Vaux and
again at Versailles Le Notre, Le Brun and Le Vau all worked well together and
were in fact friends.
Front view of the chateau
The driving force behind the creation of Vaux was Nicolas
Fouquet; he was one of the few men capable of leading such an undertaking, when
you consider that at times the amount of men working at the Chateau numbered
eighteen thousand! The leadership of Fouquet and the creation of Vaux by these
talented men was described by William Howard Adams when he wrote’ ‘’The gardens at Vaux were the most complex
ever undertaken in France before, and the organising force and personality
behind such a stupendous enterprise had to be the Minister of Finance himself,
who could personally direct an undertaking of imperial magnitude. First, three
offending villages were levelled and the River Angueil marshalled into a canal
over three thousand feet long. Earth was moved to form massive terraces,
parterres, and ramps, followed by tree planting on an imposing scale. A hospital
was especially built for the workmen in a nearby village. When the major work
was completed in 1661, the results of Le Notre’s informing genius and that of
his colleagues had created nothing less than a masterpiece’’.
The problem was that Vaux Le Vicomte became the final
catalyst in Fouquet’s downfall. Work started at Vaux in 1656 and was completed
enough (but not completely) to hold a ‘Grand
Fete’ on the 17th August 1661, held primarily to honour the King, although this totally back
fired and led to Fouquet spending the rest of his life a prisoner at the Kings
pleasure. Many reports of the Grand Fete
have overestimated the number of guests, these range from three to six
thousand, in fact there was only around one thousand. Whether or not you believe
Fouquet should be cast as a villain or hero is a different matter and not for
this article, or whether he was a victim of his own ego, history will continue
to disagree on. Personally I believe he was all of these and indeed had a huge
ego, but I urge you to read the excellent book ‘The man who outshone the Sun King’ by Charles Drazin and you can
decide for yourself. Fouquet’s motto was; Quo
non ascendet – What heights might he not reach. He never reached the
heights he aspired to. Fouquet from prison wrote these words, ‘’this was the estate I regarded as my
principal seat, and where I intended to leave some traces of the status I had
enjoyed’’.

Despite myth, Fouquet was not the mysterious figure known
as the ‘man in the iron mask’. Louis XV1 was the last man to know the identity
of this person and he took the name to the guillotine.
Andre Le Notre is unarguably the most influential and
talented landscape architect ever to set foot in a garden and at Vaux he
created a landscape that has yet to be surpassed.

Andre Le Notre 1613-1700
Andre Le Notre 1613-1700
Le Notre was able to change levels, create vistas and
play tricks on the eye without the aid of sophisticated surveying equipment. This is explained by Adams discussing the
large square mirror pool, ‘’Visitors to
the garden of Vaux Le Vicomte experience another illusionistic effect after
walking around the large square pool at the end of the lawn parterre and turning
back towards the chateau the whole building is reflected in the water, even
though it is more than a quarter mile distant. This is the first miroir d’ eau
in the history of the art of gardening: water used as a mirror, one of Le
Notre’s inventions. Unlike earlier renaissance gardens Vaux was conceived
as a whole with the chateau and garden being intimately linked together, a
central axis of just under two miles starting in front of the building and
continuing through the centre of the chateau to the horizon. Linear perspective
had been discovered and was used to perfection by Le Notre, it started to have
a real revolutionary effect in art and garden design. The strong central axis displayed at Vaux demonstrates the
classical order and symmetry of the design.
This photograph shows the vista from the tower looking
along the axis. The two main parterre de broderie can be seen. They were also
called ‘Tapis de Turquerie’ after the Turkish carpet which were the inspiration
of the motifs. The design of this parterre is described by Michael Brix, ‘’The most important measure undertaken was no
doubt the redesign of the large parterre, which Le Notre extended considerably
towards the south, giving it a form that was very unusual for the age. Until
that time it was common to design such a parterre as a self-contained unity: a
square that was subdivided into four beds with a fountain or pool at the
centre. Le Notre, by contrast, designed an elongated embroidery parterre that
is divided into just two parts, with a symmetrical axis that is powerfully
emphasized’’. During the 17th Century, sand, charcoal, crushed
brick and coal would have been used to produce the colour required between the
box plants. The parterres designed by le Notre were lost by 1875; they had been
turfed over in the 1700 hundreds and were not reinstated until 1923 by Achille
Duchene. The rond d’eau marks the centre of the garden.
The French formal garden as at Vaux displayed a tight
control and even rigidity over nature, this can be described as ‘’Art over
nature’. This does lead you to think that nature was not considered or respected,
but this was not the case and is explained by Adams, ‘’In theory and in practice, French garden art emphasized the formal
subordination of nature to reason and order, there was, in fact, a wide-spread,
almost romantic awareness of nature expressed by Le Notre’s contemporaries.
Poets, novelists, nobles, and bourgeoisie conveyed a deeply felt and coherent
appreciation of nature’s pleasures’’. Hunting was the most popular pastime
of the court and of course carried out in the countryside, probably leading to
an understanding and appreciation of nature.


The
photograph on the left shows one end of the canal known as the ‘frying pan’,
where boats sailing on the canal could turn. On the evening of the grand fete a
large wooden whale was rowed up the canal and was the launch platform for a
spectacular firework display. The photograph on the right shows the River
Angueil before it is taken into the garden. The canal formed from
the river was altered by 45 degrees and canalised over a length of one
Kilometre. From the main axis the canal through the skill of Le Notre cannot be
seen until you are literally a few feet from it, creating an element of
surprise. The canal also has a stream that was diverted underground to feed the
moat and pools, drain into it, a feature known as the cascade.
The grotto at Vaux seems to rise from the square pool
which forms part of the canal and was and still is the most famous feature of
Vaux. The sheer size cannot be appreciated unless you stand in front of it. The
grotto was designed by Le Notre or Le Brun, no one can be really certain. The
figure on the left represents the River Anqueil and the right side represents
the River Tiber. There are seven vaulted scalloped recesses separated by a
figure representing Atlantes. The movement and shape of the surrounding steps
was inspired by the Italian baroque, probably Villa d’ Este. Looking from the
steps back towards the chateau, the sheer wonder of Le Notre’s masterpiece can
be seen. The wonderful harmony of the horizontal planes which show the change
in levels along the length of the garden that finishes with the final level of
the chateau in the distance.
Vaux became the blueprint for the baroque garden style in
France. Louis X1V invited Le Notre, Le Brun and Le Vau to work for him at Versailles.
Vaux became the nursery for the greatest talent in France. Le Notre stayed with
the King for the rest of his working life, working for the King at other
chateau and palaces. The King loved Le Notre and Le Notre the King. Louis
offered him a coat of arms and Le Notre being the man he was chose three cabbages
and snails as his crest! Louis gave Le Notre the highest honour by allowing him
to take his arm in the garden. Le Notre also famously said in his old age while
being pushed by the King in his wheeled chair at Versailles, that his father
would not believe that the greatest King on earth was pushing him, the humble
gardener.
Vaux showed the baroque style in its most perfect form
and still does to this day, being as it is the perfect example of a formal
garden. The total control and subjugation of nature, a strict control imposed
on the garden. The garden is a masterpiece of symmetry and geometric form. Le
Notre manipulated the topography of the site, moving vast amounts of earth to
gain the graduated levels he wished to see. The garden was enhanced by statues,
fountains and topiary in the most perfect forms. Vaux surpassed mere
horticulture; it went past simply being a garden and open air theatre but moved
to an art form in its own right created by the ultimate landscape architect.
I urge you to visit Vaux, it is a place of beauty, history
hangs heavy in the air. Time your visit
for one of the weekends when the water features are turned on, or stay until
11pm and see the chateau and garden lit up with thousands of candles and enjoy
the fireworks in honour of the original owner. I hope you love and enjoy Vaux
Le Vicomte as much as I do. The author does run guided tours to Vaux.
Vaux
Le Vicomte
77950
Maincy
France
Tel
- +33 (0) 1.64.14.41.90
Monday, March 18, 2013
Book Review. The Hermit in the Garden by Gordon Campbell
The Hermit in the Garden
Professor Gordon Campbell has opened the proverbial can of worms! I do not believe that anyone who reads this book will be able to look at a hermitage again in the same way. I also believe that not many people would have appreciated before that the hermitage they are seeing was probably inhabited by an actual hermit! The story of the hermitage is fascinating; Professor Campbell’s book has been painstakingly and meticulously researched with excellent supportive photographs and illustrations. This is a well written book superbly produced and more than worth the purchase price. There are at times books you have the pleasure of reading on subjects that you may not have considered before that make soulless electronic reading devices rightly redundant.
The chapter on ‘The Hermits’, those mysterious figures, makes compelling reading for a number of reasons. The main one being the lengths the garden owners went to, too procure their own hermit. How bizarre looking with our modern eyes to place an advert for such a position. On one level the aristocracy employing a hermit for entertainment leaves an uncomfortable feeling. Professor Campbell tackles this by linking the eventual demise of the hermit to abolitionism; he states that the hermit came to be ‘regarded as analogous to that of the slave’. There were other reasons for their demise in garden hermitages. As Campbell again states ‘pleasing melancholy’ was falling out of fashion. Gardens or parts of a garden were designed to invoke a feeling of melancholy in the visitor not melancholy as we think today but a desired state of mind. Campbell explains the hermitage by saying, ‘at its core lies a notion of contemplative solitude and pleasurable melancholy, but it was also a fashion’.
The chapters cover all aspects of this subject in detail; particularly interesting is the link with architecture and literature. The origins of the hermitage and its roots in Europe are also discussed and explored. Hadrian’s small house island retreat in Villa Adriana at Tivoli is seen as the catalyst for the hermitage idea. Professor Campbell discusses the different levels of the hermitage including the ones connected to some of the Royal houses of Europe. On one level a hermitage could be no more than a cave or hut but then Marly designed for Louis X1V was a pavilion or small chateau built for Louis and his friends but still with the idea of comparative solitude. Marie-Antoinette’s Le Petit Trianon and the Hameau were designed for a degree of solitude but obviously again on a grander scale.
The garden owner once having employed his hermit would impose certain terms and conditions. Professor Campbell has discovered accounts of some of these terms as at Painshill Park in Surrey, the conditions being set by Charles Hamilton. Professor Campbell writes, ‘the late owner Mr Hamilton advertised for a person who was willing to become the hermit of that retreat, under the following among many other conditions: that he was to dwell in the hermitage for seven years; where he should be provided with a bible, optical glasses, a mat for his bed, and a hassock for his pillow, an hour glass for his timepiece, water for his beverage from the stream that runs at the back of his cot, and food from the house, which was to be brought him daily by a servant, but with whom he has never to exchange one syllable, he was to wear a camblet robe, never to cut his beard or his nails, to tread on sandals, nor ever to stray in the open parts of the ground nor beyond their limits, that if he lived under all these restrictions till the end of his term, he was to receive seven hundred guineas; but on any breach of any one of them, or if he quitted his place any time previous to that term, the whole was to be forfeited, and all his loss of time remediless. One person attempted it, but three week were the utmost extent of his abode’.
For garden historians the extensive bibliography will be useful as will the list of hermitages in Great Britain and Europe. I recommend this book it will complement any study of gardens in the 18th and 19th centuries.
The Hermit in the Garden by Gordon Campbell. Published by Oxford University press.
Saturday, March 9, 2013
THE ENGLISH LANDSCAPE MOVEMENT
In
the early 18th Century English gardens were undergoing a cultural
revolution, such a swing in fashion as to be unprecedented. London and Wise
were still designing gardens with features such as knots, parterres and formal
axis lines but the fashion was failing, loud voices were being exercised
against the rigid geometry and symmetry of the English formal garden. One of
these voices belonged to Joseph Addison. Writing in the Spectator in 1712 he
stated, ‘Our British gardeners on the
contrary, instead of humouring nature, love to deviate from it as much as
possible. Our trees rise in cones, globes and pyramids. We see the marks of the
scissors upon every plant and bush. I do not know whether I am singular in my
opinion, but for my own part I would rather look upon a tree in all its
luxuriance than when it is thus cut and trimmed into a mathematical figure’.
Why did the English
Landscape movement emerge? There were a number of reasons all gathering
momentum since the end of the 17th Century. Firstly the death of
Louis X1V in 1715 saw the conclusion of the French baroque style as an
innovative design force and its influence in England waned considerably.
England had also been ruled by a Dutchman, William III and his wife Mary II, and
had been at war with the French; England was tired now of what it saw as
foreign influence and wished for change.
Social attitudes were
also changing and the formal gardens were not delivering what was desired,
exercise, fresh air and conversation while enjoying a walk. The English desire
to enjoy a country walk cannot be underestimated and the desire not to see the
garden all at once. They wanted the garden to reveal itself sensuously, little by
little as the walk progressed. This was totally unlike the formal garden that
was laid out to see in its entirety along the central axis.
The weather also
played a part in the change. The formal garden in France had weather more
suited to open air entertainment than the English formal garden. This is
described by Clifford, ‘The gardens of
France were stages upon which to parade and be seen… But for how many days of
the year is it possible to live in an English garden? How suitable is the
English weather for parading up and down in fine clothing? England is no place
for the great ceremonial occasion en plein air unless suitable shelter is at hand…
In England a garden has never been
primarily a place to sit in, or a place to debate in, or a place to act in; not
for the English the fetes champetres of
Fontainebleau and Chantilly or Pliny’s suppers at the fountain; for the English
a garden has always been a place to walk about in and to play games in’.
Financial
considerations also played a part in the change. A formal garden would require constant
maintenance. Clipping was needed to keep the shapes of the topiary and the box
parterres. The waterworks required regular maintenance and the gravel needed
weeding and raking. The amount of gardeners just to keep a formal garden
running was large. Apart from the initial set up costs of the English landscape
garden, which could be high, the aftercare costs were far lighter than formal
gardens. Clifford explains this when he says, ‘yet when all is said one may well think the chief cause of the Great
Revolution to have been economic……..but the elimination of costly frills was an
obvious way to meet the demand for greater economies’.
The pressure of how
you were perceived by your peers also played a major role, it was no longer
enough to be wealthy, the gentry desired to be seen as educated and well versed
in the arts and classics, wealth alone was not enough to show status. This
knowledge and understanding of the classics and the perception of taste was fed
by the ‘Grand Tour’. The ‘natural’ element of the Italian renaissance and
baroque garden seen on the grand tour was such an important element of the
English landscape garden concept. The Italian gardens incorporated the bosco, a
contrived but natural looking woodland or grove attached to the formal garden
in which a path would wind. The important statement this bosco or grove was
making was, look we are no longer scared of the natural landscape. There was a
real juxtaposition between the formal and natural garden, the first English
visitors on the grand tour to see these gardens such as the garden at Villa
Lante viewed this naturalistic woodland setting attached to the formal garden
and it appealed greatly to the English psyche. They saw this natural woodland
and realised that it could be transposed into their country estates. This can
be described as nature and art working together, the basis of the first English
Landscape garden, derived from the gardens of Italy. Hobhouse describes this; ‘the appreciation of the dual role of nature
and art in laying out gardens, which was to become such a part of English
landscape garden theory, was one imbibed from Italy. The dream of the classical
gardens of Rome and the Italian countryside was absorbed into the new era of
William Kent and Capability Brown’.
The Dying Gladiator at Rousham
The dying gladiator sits above the seven arched
Praeneste at Rousham; he will be dying until the day he finally crumbles. This
moving sculpture represents the gladiatorial games from ancient Rome; the
gladiator having lost his fight has fallen, he lay’s on his shield with his
sword on the ground next to him. Ancient Rome was represented in a garden by
its architecture but also by its sculpture and art. Not all created in situ as
this piece was, but a colossal amount of sculpture rightly or wrongly was
transported back to England from the grand tour. Lord Burlington from Chiswick
Park even brought back statues from Hadrian’s Villa to be displayed in his
temple and Exedra. It is also considered that this sculpture could represent
General Dormer, seriously injured at the Battle of Blenheim and who suffered
from his wounds for the rest of his life.
Landscape paintings
were a main source of inspiration for the exponents of the new movement,
artists such as Poussin, Lorrain, Rosa, Canaletto, and Dughet were all
influential in shaping the English landscape movement. Pope wrote that ‘All gardening is landscape painting, just
like a landscape hung up’. The landscape was in the process of becoming a
composition. The artists used oils and canvas to depict the landscape, while
the designers of the English Landscape movement used the countryside as their
canvas inspired by these paintings. The British visitors on the ‘Grand Tour’
created a demand for paintings of the celebrated sites such as Venetian
festivals, sea ports, the Roman Campagna, and classical, romantic and
allegorical scenes. These paintings would become the blue print for the English
landscape gardens and also the inspiration for the designers. Artists such as
Lorrain and Poussin painted ‘Arcadian’ scenes in which ancient ruins and
temples, cascades and ancient groves were seen. Henry Hoare’s garden at
Stourhead was inspired by the work of Lorrain in which temples and ruins were
seen in an idealized or romanticised classical landscape.
The Pantheon at Stourhead
Many gardens also told a story. Stourhead’s
allegorical meaning, obvious then but not so now to modern minds, told the
story from the ‘Aeneid’, by Virgil about the founding of Rome. Lorrain painted
a landscape called ‘Coast View of Delos with Aeneas’ which shows the Pantheon.
Other buildings in the painting are represented at Stourhead. The Pantheon
represents part of the journey by Aeneas before he arrived in Italy. This
illustration shows how these buildings were placed to be seen from various
selected positions in the garden; they were called ‘eyecatchers’. They were
also places where guests walking the garden circuit could stop to take
refreshment and rest.
The designers of the
new style no longer needed to be landscape architects in the school of Le
Notre, obeying the rules of formality, mathematics and geometry but instead
they designed by the rules of the painters, and informality and nature. They
created pastoral scenes from the imagination.
The Gothic Temple at Stowe
This is a scene of pastoral calm. The garden also
providing some agricultural use and displaying the beauty of the English
countryside, the countryside brought into the garden. During Lord Cobham’s time
at Stowe he had many buildings designed and built, by Vanbrugh and Kent. These
buildings told many stories and also made many political statements.
The new philosophy towards
nature meant that it was now an equal in the relationship with man and was not
simply there to be subjugated. Instead of the formal regularity the
irregularity of nature was sought and as Jellicoe states, ‘ nature was no longer subservient to man, but
a friendly and equal partner which could provide inexhaustible interest,
refreshment and moral uplift; irregularity rather than regularity was
proclaimed as the objective of landscape design’.
The
old regime was under relentless attack, Plumptre explains, ‘By the last years of the 17th C
formal gardening in England was coming under threat from various directions.
The manner in which the concept of the garden had begun to be extended beyond
regimented geometric enclosures marked the beginnings of the move from garden
to landscape’.
The ha-ha at Rousham
The ha-ha is the most important invention in
garden design history. Before this boundaries had to be defined by a wall, in
effect still visibly enclosing a garden. The ha-ha meant the ‘concealment of bounds’,
now a garden could look as if it extended into the countryside, making the garden
boundary seemingly disappear. Along with the ha-ha came William Kent, Walpole
said of him, ‘he leaped the fences, and
saw that all nature was a garden’. Kent saw that all nature and the
landscape could be brought into the garden, the borrowed landscape idea created
over three hundred years ago. Clifford explains this when he says, ‘it was the making of what lay within the
boundary look like what lay outside it’. Kent was the first man to ‘consult
the genius of the place’.
The epithet English
Landscape movement is too simple to give true and accurate meaning; we need to
break down the movement into its parts. The name will always be widely used as
this is the name that most people easily recognise, but the four sub-movements
are the; Augustan (neoclassical), Serpentine, Picturesque (Romantic) and
Landscape (eclectic).
The Augustan period
(1700-1750) was the first period of the new movement and named after Emperor
Augustus, and the Augustan poets who wanted to recreate the past glories of
ancient Rome. This period can also be called neoclassical because the gardens
emulated or at least attempted to emulate the classical landscape and
architecture of Rome and ancient Greece. As David C Stuart wrote regarding the
psychological pull of the classical world, ‘The
world of ancient Rome has almost always exerted a powerful appeal to men
unfortunate enough to have been born after its fall’. The gardens were
liberally scattered with classical architecture such as temples. Also included
were grottoes, statues, groves and other illusions to antiquity. The Augustan period
saw gardens such as Chiswick, and Rousham created. William Kent (family name
Cant) was the most influential designer and architect of this period, Rousham
being without doubt the finest garden in England.
The Palladian Bridge at
Stowe
The term Palladian is taken from the 16th
century architect Andrea Palladio. Lord Burlington was one of the men
responsible for the ‘neo-Palladian’ style of architecture that became the
fashion in the 18th century. This beautiful covered bridge was built
to allow the family and its guests to make a circular drive around the garden.
The aim of this bridge was also to support a classical feel to the garden and
to provide a focal point from different positions. When viewed from the Doric
arch the bridge is framed between the two arches.
The ‘Serpentine’
period (1750-1783) is predominately the most well know of the four, it was
categorised by a noticeably more natural theme, this naturalisation of the
landscape was considered to bring the landowner closer to God, and it would
bring man and nature into peaceful coexistence thus creating harmony. The
gardens in this period would be ones such as, Petworth, and Chatsworth. Any
formality such as a terrace, which had survived, surrounding the main house
during the Augustan period was swept away now, and the turf came like a tide to
the front of the property covering everything. The main designer in this
period, Lancelot Brown, was not though unwilling to add the odd temple if it
suited his design, as can be seen at Petworth.
The park at Petworth
The illustration shows the grass at Petworth
running right up to the house. There was once a formal garden by London and
Wise but Brown removed it entirely. Brown sculpted the landscape, creating a
large lake in the middle distance, and built hills from the spoil. He planted
what looked like randomly grouped clumps of trees but they were in fact
carefully positioned. If you look at the rolling hills in the park you will see
they are sensuously shaped and resemble the soft curves of the female form, a
deliberate move by Brown. All formality had gone and Brown created these
serpentine shapes and lines. This period was to be eventually considered bland
and boring, and Brown in many people’s eyes is either the hero or the villain
of English garden design.
The ‘Picturesque’
period (1783-1813) was the third and came about as a reaction against the
Serpentine period; Brown had fallen out of fashion. This period saw gardens
move away from places to entertain and walk, but instead took the form of a
rugged and rustic landscape with rivers running through the land, turned if
possible into raging torrents, with features such as rustic bridges and
cascades. The only connection the picturesque had with the desperately out of
fashion baroque was that both were better viewed from height to gain the full
perspective. This style of garden worked far more effectively in the north of
England with the topography lending itself well, far better than in the flatter
south. This period can also be called the ‘Romantic’ period; the meaning of the
word in this case describes a feeling of strong emotion. The gardens were to be
held in awe and wonder and the awe inspired by untamed nature.
As a reaction to Browns landscapes the
Picturesque movement came to the fore. The landscape was to become ‘Romantic’
and moved away from the tameness’ of Brown. The garden was to become rough and
rugged with irregularity and a natural wild aspect brought into the garden. The
scene in the illustration is best viewed from height and includes a ruin
creating the Picturesque image at Scotney. Rosa was known as ‘Savage’ Rosa his
paintings inspired this style of design. The idea was to create torrents and
crags and a general natural landscape. The designers wanted to create a Picturesque
view from each window of the associated house.
The ‘landscape’
period (1800-1900) was the last and was characterised by the landscape movement
coming back around in almost a full circle. The course of action taken was to
reintroduce some degree of formality back around the house but a very eclectic
mix of English and European style, aesthetically this style did not always
work, and did not always lend itself to any degree of harmony. The style saw
the emergence of the mass carpet bedding schemes of the Victorian era and the
‘Gardenesque’ style. Designers such as Repton and Barry were to the fore and
the period saw gardens such as Trentham Park.
Hamilton at Painshill decided for his
amusement and the amusement of his guests to build a hermitage in the park and
employ a hermit to live in it for seven years. If this task was undertaken
successfully the hermit was to receive a fortune which today would be around
£90,000. The hermit was employed and agreed to the conditions of service. He
was to be given a bible, optical glasses, a mat for the floor, a pillow, an
hour glass to keep the time and he was to receive water to drink and his food
would come from the house. He was also to wear a goat’s hair robe and must
never cut his hair, beard or nails and never leave the park. These harsh
conditions took their toll, within the first month the hermit was found drunk
in the local pub and sacked.
We still have over
one hundred English Landscape gardens in the country, most bar Rousham
underwent a series of changes with the succession of different designers. This
summer take the time to visit some of them, many need your support and as at
Painshill are worthy of it.
Monday, March 4, 2013
VILLA GAMBERAIA
The Garden of Princess Ghyka
The garden of Villa Gamberaia in the village of
Settignano on the hillside above Florence is the most perfect example of an
Italian garden. At Gamberaia the overwhelming feeling is that you are intruding
into the private space of Princess Ghyka, you can feel her presence everywhere.
| The view towards Florence from the garden |
Gamberaia became the blue print for the renaissance of
the Italian garden style; it was considered the best example of how an Italian
garden should look. Geoffrey Jellicoe said that Gamberaia was more Italian than
the Italians. Garden designers and landscape architects from England, France,
Germany and America all studied Gamberaia, and wondered at its creation in such
a difficult shape. Edith Wharton wrote about Gamberaia and said, ‘’The plan of the Gamberaia has been
described thus in detail because it combines in an astonishingly small space,
yet without the least sense of overcrowding, almost every typical excellence of
the old Italian garden: free circulation of sunlight and air about the house;
abundance of water; easy access to dense shade; sheltered walks with different
points of view, variety of effect produced by the skilful use of different levels;
and finally breadth and simplicity of composition’’. Gamberaia was the
inspiration for the garden created at Villa Le Balze by Cecil Pinsent, and it
is considered that Vita Sack-Ville West took inspiration from here, for the
white garden, the blossom from the lemon trees and the white roses in the lemon
garden impressed Vita very much. Vita was a friend of Princess Ghyka and a
visitor to Gamberaia.
Catherine Jeanne Keshko was the wife of Prince Ghyka, and
was Rumanian. She became Princess Ghyka and bought Gamberaia, although her
husband probably never visited the villa. Princess Ghyka disliked men and lived
with her lover Florence Blood, who has been described as both British and
American, depending on which author you read. Florence Blood was more outgoing
but Princess Ghyka led a secretive life, shunning contact with people who were
not close friends as far as possible. Gamberaia become the hub of Lesbian life
in this region and attracted a group of English and American female actors and authors
who could lead the life they wished to, unrestricted by anti-homosexual laws
such as in Britain at that time.
Princess Ghyka
employed Martino Porcina as her head gardener; he worked alongside Luigi
Messeri to create Gamberaia. The garden was designed with a mix of renaissance
and baroque styles on a very small site, being only around one hectare, but
with simply stunning views overlooking Florence. The mistake must not be made
that Gamberaia and other Florentine villas such as Le Balze are renaissance gardens;
they are not, as Hobhouse explains. ‘’Although
almost modern creations, they beautifully illustrate the whole renaissance
formula. In both, the axial principles and use of space are easily recognizable
as renaissance inspired- indeed they are nearly exaggerations of the real
thing’’. The garden is designed around a Series of axis and different
vista’s, it uses the open agricultural countryside to the south and also the
view over Florence to the west. The hedges frame certain views to create a
feeling of seclusion in parts of the garden while the lawn terrace has an open
view over Florence. The villa and garden were built on a steep slope long
before Princess Ghyka’s tenure, terraces had to be constructed and vast amounts
of soil had to be moved. The terraces really represent the Italian agricultural
method of farming on slopes and bring the garden into harmony with its
agricultural surroundings. This is indicative of the Medici renaissance gardens
which also had the connection with the countryside; the Medici’s originally
being farmers.

The villa on the south side has a loggia that looks over
the water parterres which are surrounded by tightly clipped box in geometrical
shapes, and then down to the cypress belvedere where once was the ‘garenne’ the
rabbit island. The shape of this area still mirrors the shape of the old rabbit
island. The tree behind the belvedere is a beautiful Corsican pine. The water
parterres were once parterre de broderie and were re-designed with water by
Princess Ghyka, she would swim in these at night when no-one could see her.
Harold Acton described the water parterres as the union of ‘’liquid and solid’’. Katie Campbell made a similar connection and wrote, ‘’with its harmonising of solid and liquid stone and watered image
and reflection, the water parterres is a brilliant modern interpretation of the
baroque style’’. Parterres are designed to be viewed from elevation and the
water parterres at Gamberaia are no different, the loggia being that elevated
area. Monty Don discussing the water parterre said, ‘’the parterre hardly reads on an initial ground level sighting. That
is not to say that it is not pleasing and impressive, but the water is almost
lost and the narrative jumbled. But go up-stairs to the loggia as I did and
look down upon it and it leaps out as a coherent plan built around four large
rectangular pools and a much smaller circular pool with a stony fountain in the
centre’’.

Looking towards the water parterre and villa
The main axis and central walk is known as the bowling
green and stretches for some two hundred and twenty metres. The bowling green
is a stunning feature and terminates at the northern end with the nymphaeum and
at the southern end with the viewing belvedere. The alley was originally lined
along its entire length with cypresses, the only ones left now along the alley
are situated around the nymphaeum, and these are now colossal giants, old and
extremely gnarled. The bowling green is an unusual feature and is not something
you would expect to see outside of an English garden, but you have to remember
the Florentine gardens had become anglicised, many were owned by ex-patriot
Americans and English.
Beneath this turf is the old renaissance aqueduct that
brought water to the garden and then out into the surrounding farm land. The
bowling green lawn is an artery that other gardens project off from, such as
the grotto, water parterre and the two bosco. Edith Wharton described the use
of turf in Italian gardens and on this scale at Gamberaia, ‘’it was said that lawns are unsuited to the
Italian soil and climate, but it must not be thought that Italian gardeners did
not appreciate the value of turf. They used it, but sparingly, knowing that it
required great care and was not a characteristic of the soil. The bowling green
of the Gamberaia shows how well the beauty of a long stretch of greensward was
understood’’.
The nymphaeum at the northern end of the bowling green is
a baroque feature that shows the connection to the renaissance and baroque in
Italian garden design. It also demonstrates the connection with ancient Rome.
The nymphaeum is enclosed by two walls that are decorated in rocailles work and
in the niche is a statue of Dionysus or Pan, but is often considered to be
Neptune. The ancient cypresses surround the nymphaeum and create a cool shady area;
the water once tumbled over the figure and the two lions each side of it.
The grotto or cabinet
di roccaglia which as you turn your back on the nymphaeum and walk south
along the bowling green is found directly behind the villa on the left. This is
a sublime space. The walls are encrusted with ornate rock work, sea shells,
stones and pebbles. The grotto is the link between the bowling green level and
the lemon garden and the two bosco. The area is filled with pots and urns and
in the niches there are small statues and plants. There are also balustrade
steps that lead to the lemon garden. Harold Acton described the grotto as, ‘’one of the prettiest open air boudoirs
imaginable’’. The idea originally was possibly to use the grotto as an open
air music room. Katie Campbell I think describes the grotto well when she
wrote, ‘’ a path from the villa back door
leads to the grotto garden, a sensuous, mysterious space whose high mosaic
embellished walls and exuberant sculptures once hid secret water games’’. The
possibility also exists that this area was once an enclosed flower garden.
The area above the grotto is where you will find the
lemon garden and the lemon house. The lemon garden is divided into four
sections. Here you will find more than just lemons but oranges, mandarins,
grapefruit and kumquats, a real selection of fruit. The lemons are in perfect
condition and the scent is wonderful. I can fully understand why Louis X1V
filled Versailles palace and the garden with these plants, they are truly
wonderful to behold. The lemon and the orange for that matter are Tuscany
itself, the two so connected as to be inseparable.
Gamberaia is full of flowering plants contrasting
wonderfully with the foil of the bowling green and the range of hedging plants
and box topiary throughout the garden. There are a row of stunning Albertine
roses in front of the lemon house which in May look simply wonderful. There are
lavender are many types of Mediterranean plants all adding to the colour at
Gamberaia. The plants though that are emblematic of Tuscany are the evergreens
and non-more so than the Cupressus semperviren’s, these rise like pencils all
over the landscape, they are proud, tall and strong and without doubt the most beautiful and dominant tree. The
Quercus ilex is another Mediterranean tree that is widely used and is the best
of all the oaks. At Gamberaia this tree is used to populate the selvatico or
bosco.
The last feature I will look at is the lawn terrace that
overlooks Florence. The villas that are spread around the side of the Arno
valley all look in towards the city, and put simply the view of Florence and
especially the Duomo is one that you never forget. The low wall of this terrace
has more Albertine roses on it and there are urns and sculptures of dogs and
lions. The dogs it has been said are standing guard over the villa and its
grounds and have been doing so for around three hundred years.
Gamberaia is a beautiful garden and one that has been an
inspiration over countless years, for many generations of architects and
designers from countries all over Europe and America. The garden as I said at
the beginning still feels the private space of the Princess; it is calm and
serene and simply wonderfully designed and constructed. I do urge you to visit
some of the gardens in this region, Medici villas or otherwise, but whatever
you see and whenever you come, make an appointment to see Gamberaia.
During the Second World War many villas in this area and
in fact all over Italy suffered various degrees of damage, not always directly
caused by the Germans but mainly by American bombing, although at Gamberaia it
was German action that caused the damage. With this in mind I leave the last
word to Bernard Berenson who went back to see Gamberaia after the war, ‘’Walked over to Villa Gamberaia, found it
neglected, unkempt, grass not mown, trees with branches broken looking like
elephants with broken tusks, the house burnt out with the beautiful courtyard
fallen in, vases and stone animals on parapet thrown down and broken – and yet
the place retains its charm, its power to inspire longing and dreams, sweet
dreams. Its beauty though so uncared for is still great enough to absorb one
almost completely, the terraces, the ponds, the great apse of cut cypresses,
the bowling green as you look at it from the grotto toward the south like a
great boat sailing through space, the view over the quiet landscape of the
Chianti hills and further over the domes and towers to the snow-capped
Apennines and the Arno glimmering in the plain’’.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)